<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>One common objection </title>
        <link>http://ruwarchy.com/topic/367/t/One-common-objection.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ While I think the arguments made at www.restore04.com stand on their own, and
I urge everyone to read the petition at that site, I want to respond to one common objection offered to the idea of a comprehensive platform: that it scares
people away from the party.   My take:


(1) The primary purpose of a platform is to define to the members of the LP who we are and what we believe.  It is also an absolutely essential tool for
candidates and activists so that we learn about all the issues that... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:30:11 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 08:16:40 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: One common objection  ]]></title>
			<link>http://ruwarchy.com/reply/54/t/One-common-objection.html#reply-54</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Frank Robinson?
<br>
<br>
Whatever comes out of Denver in 2008, and whatever the official decision of the LP, I do want to work on such a web project as soon as the election is over.
<br>
<br>
By the way, you might be able to answer a question that has come up repeatedly: was the 1972 convention exclusively a minarchist affair?
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Less Antman)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ruwarchy.com/sreply/54</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 08:16:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: One common objection  ]]></title>
			<link>http://ruwarchy.com/reply/53/t/One-common-objection.html#reply-53</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I am especially interested in restructuring the LP along the lines you allude to to make it more &#39;web-relevant&#39;. Oh, BTW, I signed Restore04 petition.
I am also the person who chaired the Bylaws committee at the 1972 Denver convention. Portland was a screw up. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (savvysooner)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ruwarchy.com/sreply/53</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 21:29:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: One common objection  ]]></title>
			<link>http://ruwarchy.com/reply/24/t/One-common-objection.html#reply-24</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ A few thoughts Less:
<br>
1-If a candidate feels he or she has to defend a platform they don&#39;t understand, they are, IMHO not prepared well enough, or knowledgeable enough in
libertarianism to know how the philosophy applies in many specific issues. <span style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">If fewer candidates
will run because they feel they have to &quot;run away&quot; from a comprehensive libertarian platform, it sheds light on the gaping hole in the LP&#39;s
internal... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Freedhwy)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ruwarchy.com/sreply/24</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 22:31:24 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ One common objection  ]]></title>
			<link>http://ruwarchy.com/topic/367/t/One-common-objection.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ While I think the arguments made at <a title="www.restore04.com" target="_blank" href="http://www.restore04.com">www.restore04.com</a> stand on their own, and
I urge everyone to read the petition at that site, I want to respond to one common objection offered to the idea of a comprehensive platform: that it scares
people away from the party.   My take:
<br>
<br>
(1) The primary purpose of a platform is to define to the members of the LP who we are and what we believe.  It is also an... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Less Antman)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ruwarchy.com/topic/367</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:30:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>